<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>The Rocket Stop &#187; Engineering</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.therocketstop.com/category/engineering/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.therocketstop.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 04:18:32 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Who invented the NASA advanced wheelchair?</title>
		<link>http://www.therocketstop.com/2011/12/who-invented-the-nasa-advanced-wheelchair/</link>
		<comments>http://www.therocketstop.com/2011/12/who-invented-the-nasa-advanced-wheelchair/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Dec 2011 16:42:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Engineering]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nasa]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Spinoff Project]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wheelchair]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.therocketstop.com/2011/12/who-invented-the-nasa-advanced-wheelchair/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I am doing a NASA spinoff project and I must include the biography of those that developed the project. PLEASE HELP!!!work at home mom
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><br/>I am doing a NASA spinoff project and I must include the biography of those that developed the project. PLEASE HELP!!!<br/><a href='http://www.promotingmom.com'>work at home mom</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.therocketstop.com/2011/12/who-invented-the-nasa-advanced-wheelchair/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Why has NASA designed the new Orion space capsule for a land recovery rather than a conventional splahdown?</title>
		<link>http://www.therocketstop.com/2010/06/why-has-nasa-designed-the-new-orion-space-capsule-for-a-land-recovery-rather-than-a-conventional-splahdown/</link>
		<comments>http://www.therocketstop.com/2010/06/why-has-nasa-designed-the-new-orion-space-capsule-for-a-land-recovery-rather-than-a-conventional-splahdown/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Jun 2010 23:27:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Engineering]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Failure]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nasa]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Orion Space Capsule]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.therocketstop.com/2010/06/why-has-nasa-designed-the-new-orion-space-capsule-for-a-land-recovery-rather-than-a-conventional-splahdown/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
All previous American capsules (Mercury, Gemini, Apollo) splashed down in the ocean when returning.  The U.S. navy provided recovery operations to NASA.  The system was extremely simple, practical and completely passive with ocean water providing cooling to the heat shield, a soft &#8220;cushion&#8221; on which to land, shock absorption and a near infinite [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div style="float:left; padding: 12px"><a href="/wp-content/uploads/2009/12/nasa24.jpg"><img src="/wp-content/uploads/2009/12/nasa24.jpg" title='' alt='' /></a></div>
<div>All previous American capsules (Mercury, Gemini, Apollo) splashed down in the ocean when returning.  The U.S. navy provided recovery operations to NASA.  The system was extremely simple, practical and completely passive with ocean water providing cooling to the heat shield, a soft &#8220;cushion&#8221; on which to land, shock absorption and a near infinite landing area free of obstacles.  For the Orion NASA has adopted the far more complex and dangerous Russian approach of landing capsules on solid ground.  Landing will require larger parachutes for a slower descent, a large crumple zone underneath for shock absorption, a dangerous solid-fuled retro-rocket system within the capsule to further slow descent plus jettisoning the massive heat shield to further lighten impact.  Failure of any part of the system would almost certainly mean injury or loss of the crew.  NASA claims the move will save enormous recovery cost $$.  But the navy could provide all that free of charge.  What savings?<br/><a href='http://www.nevaa.org'>never say never</a></div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.therocketstop.com/2010/06/why-has-nasa-designed-the-new-orion-space-capsule-for-a-land-recovery-rather-than-a-conventional-splahdown/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

